What Happened
In February 2025, former FBI Special Agent Kevin Gounaud sent an email to a colleague proposing a criminal investigation into Elon Musk. The basis for this proposed probe was Musk's 'DOGE' government efficiency initiative, which involved sending emails to federal employees via the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) requesting them to list five accomplishments from the previous week. Musk's public post on X, stating that 'failure to respond will be taken as a resignation,' was cited by Gounaud as potential blackmail. Gounaud also alleged that Musk violated federal statutes against personal enrichment, suggesting Musk's X account, which he owns, might have been monetized through this initiative. The agent explicitly stated, 'Happy to write the case opening and find a prosecutor (or at least try),' indicating a clear intent to pursue legal action against Musk and OPM personnel who approved the email transmission.
Senator Chuck Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, declassified this email during a Tuesday hearing with FBI Director Kash Patel on September 15, 2026. Grassley, an Iowa Republican, has consistently spearheaded investigations into alleged partisanship within the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The declassification of Gounaud's email adds to a series of documents released by Grassley's committee and the Trump administration, which, according to Grassley, reveal senior officials operating in ways that violate the 2004 law requiring intelligence professionals to produce reporting 'independent of political considerations.'
What the Evidence Establishes
The declassified email, released by Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley, directly establishes that former FBI Special Agent Kevin Gounaud sought to open a criminal investigation into Elon Musk in February 2025. Gounaud's email explicitly details his legal theory, likening Musk's actions to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server for classified intelligence. He specifically accused Musk of 'conspiracy' with OPM personnel, 'wasting a colossal amount of official time,' and 'encouraged, abetted, aided, etc. thousands if not tens of thousands of government employees outside of a strict need to know' to violate security policy by transmitting sensitive information. The email also cites potential violations of federal statutes related to personal enrichment and blackmail, based on Musk's X post regarding non-response as resignation.
The context provided by Senator Grassley's office further establishes a pattern of alleged partisan targeting within the FBI. Grassley's opening statement at the hearing with FBI Director Kash Patel highlighted a decade of making records public that show 'discredited law enforcement and intelligence officials schemed to take out Trump and other Republicans.' This incident involving Musk is presented as additional evidence of such targeting in 2026. The source also notes that Gounaud's focus on Musk's status as a Special Government Employee (SGE) represents a double standard, citing the Department of Justice's decision not to investigate Huma Abedin, who also worked as an SGE for Hillary Clinton while simultaneously employed by the Clinton Foundation.
Where the Accounts Conflict
Both the Daily Caller and the Operative Telegram Feed largely align on the core facts of the declassified email: an FBI agent, Kevin Gounaud, sought a criminal investigation into Elon Musk in February 2025 over his DOGE initiative. Both sources quote key phrases from Gounaud's email, such as his willingness to 'write the case opening and find a prosecutor' and his accusation of Musk's 'conspiracy' with OPM officials. The primary divergence lies in their framing and emphasis, rather than conflicting factual claims.
The Daily Caller provides a more detailed, journalistic account, including specific references to the 2004 law on intelligence reporting independence, previous FBI investigations like Crossfire Hurricane and Round River, and the comparison to Hillary Clinton's email server and Huma Abedin's SGE status. It maintains a relatively more neutral, albeit critical, tone. In contrast, the Operative Telegram Feed adopts a highly sensationalized and overtly partisan tone, using phrases like '🚨 WOW! Sen. Chuck Grassley just dropped a bombshell email' and 'Thankfully, that agent LEFT the FBI. Leave @ElonMusk alone! He was/is doing America a PUBLIC SERVICE.' This Telegram account explicitly advocates for Musk and condemns the FBI agent, whereas the Daily Caller presents the information with more contextual background on alleged FBI partisanship without directly endorsing Musk's actions or condemning the agent in such strong terms. However, neither source presents contradictory information regarding the content of the declassified email itself or the identities of the individuals involved.
Context and Stakes
This declassified email surfaces amidst ongoing scrutiny of the FBI's conduct and alleged political biases, particularly from Republican lawmakers like Senator Chuck Grassley. Grassley has consistently argued that elements within the federal bureaucracy, often termed the 'Deep State,' have engaged in politically motivated actions against former President Donald Trump and other Republicans. The 2004 law mandating intelligence professionals to produce politically independent reporting serves as a critical backdrop, with Grassley asserting that numerous declassified documents demonstrate violations of this ethos by senior officials.
The stakes involve public trust in federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Revelations about past investigations, such as 'Crossfire Hurricane,' which allegedly relied on 'spun, cherrypicked and in some cases wholly manufactured raw intelligence reports' like the Steele dossier, and 'Round River,' which reportedly smeared members of Congress and journalists as Russian disinformation conduits, contribute to a narrative of institutional decay. The comparison of Musk's situation to Hillary Clinton's private email server and Huma Abedin's SGE status highlights concerns about perceived double standards in the application of federal law. This incident, therefore, is not isolated but fits into a broader political struggle over accountability and transparency within the U.S. government, potentially influencing future legislative efforts regarding intelligence oversight and civil service reform.
What to Watch Next
Following the declassification of this email by Senator Grassley, attention will likely turn to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI for a formal response. Grassley's consistent pressure on these agencies suggests he will demand further accountability regarding the conduct of former Special Agent Kevin Gounaud and the broader implications of alleged partisan targeting. The DOJ may be compelled to issue a statement addressing the incident, potentially initiating an internal review or clarifying its stance on the legal theories Gounaud proposed. This could manifest as a public statement within the next 2 to 5 days, especially if media attention intensifies.
Additionally, Elon Musk's reaction to this declassification will be a key development. Given his active presence on X and his history of engaging with political controversies, Musk may publicly comment on the attempted investigation, potentially amplifying the narrative of government overreach or 'Deep State' actions. Such a response could further galvanize public debate and pressure on federal agencies. Congressional oversight committees, particularly those focused on judiciary and intelligence matters, may also leverage this declassification to push for additional hearings, document requests, or legislative proposals aimed at reforming FBI internal procedures or strengthening protections against perceived political weaponization of federal agencies. The ongoing political climate, especially with the 2026 election cycle approaching, will likely ensure this issue remains a point of contention.
Bottom Line
A declassified email from February 2025 reveals former FBI Special Agent Kevin Gounaud sought a criminal investigation into Elon Musk for his government efficiency initiative, DOGE. Gounaud's legal theory, presented to a colleague, accused Musk of conspiracy with OPM officials, wasting government time, and potentially violating federal statutes related to personal enrichment and blackmail. This declassification, spearheaded by Senator Chuck Grassley, is framed as further evidence of alleged partisan targeting within the FBI, drawing parallels to previous controversial investigations like Crossfire Hurricane and Round River, and perceived double standards in the handling of cases involving figures like Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin.
The incident underscores ongoing concerns about the political independence of federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. While the proposed investigation did not proceed, its revelation contributes to a broader narrative of institutional decay and alleged 'Deep State' activities. The immediate implications include potential demands for accountability from the DOJ and FBI, and likely public commentary from Elon Musk. The long-term impact could influence public trust in government institutions and fuel legislative efforts aimed at increasing oversight and reforming agency practices, particularly as the political landscape continues to evolve towards the next election cycle.
DECLASSIFIED SOURCE: Daily Caller
No comments yet. Start the conversation.