Trump Claims Board of Peace Secured Hamas Disarmament Deal Amid Conflicting Reports

What Happened

On July 30, 2026, US President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that the Board of Peace had reached an agreement for the complete disarmament of Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza.

Trump said Israeli forces would withdraw from Gaza as disarmament is completed and that an International Stabilization Force would cooperate with a new Palestinian police force to maintain security for residents and neighbors.

He described the deal as a critical step toward Gaza finally being governed by a new Palestinian government that would work closely with the Board of Peace.

The announcement followed rare progress in Cairo-mediated talks between international mediators and Hamas leaders, according to unnamed sources cited by Reuters on the same day.

What the Evidence Establishes

The Board of Peace, referenced by Trump, is described in earlier BBC reporting as a body originally intended to help end the war between Israel and Hamas and oversee reconstruction in Gaza.

Its proposed charter, however, does not mention the Palestinian territory and appears designed to supplant functions of the United Nations, according to the BBC.

The second phase of a US‑brokered Gaza ceasefire plan includes the disarmament of Hamas and the reconstruction of Gaza, with Cairo slated to host a mediator meeting on that phase.

Hamas elected a new leader, Khalil al‑Hayya, earlier in July 2026, replacing Yahya Sinwar, who was killed by the Israeli military in Gaza in October 2024.

Al‑Hayya has served as Hamas’s chief negotiator in indirect ceasefire talks with mediators in Egypt and Qatar.

Where the Accounts Conflict

Israeli officials have not confirmed the agreement; an unnamed Israeli official told Reuters that the proposed terms were not satisfactory.

The Times of Israel reported, citing an unnamed source, that the agreement had been signed between Hamas negotiators, the Board of Peace, and mediating countries Egypt, Qatar, and Türkiye.

However, an Israeli office issued a statement saying the disarmament proposal did not meet Jerusalem's demands, contradicting the Times of Israel’s claim of a signed deal.

Earlier in the day, Israeli media outlets reported that Israel was opposed to a deal being discussed with Hamas, indicating internal disagreement within the Israeli government.

Context and Stakes

The conflict between Israel and Hamas began with the Hamas‑led attack on Israel on 7 October 2023, which resulted in approximately 1,200 deaths and 250 hostages taken, according to multiple sources.

Israel’s subsequent military campaign in Gaza has caused over 73,290 fatalities, including 21,280 children, according to the Hamas‑run health ministry in the territory.

Israeli forces have been constructing new land barriers inside Gaza, displacing families, and recent strikes have killed at least twelve people, including a family of six, as reported by medics.

The Board of Peace’s charter, which omits any reference to Gaza territory, raises questions about its mandate and whether it intends to bypass existing UN mechanisms for peacekeeping and reconstruction.

What to Watch Next

Observers should monitor whether the Israeli government issues an official rejection or acceptance of the Board of Peace proposal within the next 48 to 72 hours.

The scheduled Cairo mediator meeting on the second phase of the ceasefire plan will be a key venue for clarifying whether Hamas, Israel, and international mediators share a common understanding of disarmament steps.

Any movement of Israeli forces out of Gaza, or the deployment of an International Stabilization Force, will provide concrete evidence of implementation progress.

Statements from Hamas leadership, particularly from chief negotiator Khalil al‑Hayya, will indicate whether the group has formally accepted the disarmament terms.

Bottom Line

At present, the evidence shows a proclamation by President Trump without verifiable confirmation from Hamas, Israel, or the Board of Peace that a binding disarmament agreement exists.

The conflicting accounts—Israeli officials rejecting the terms, an Israeli office denying the deal, and reports of a signed accord—create significant uncertainty about the agreement’s status.

Unless concrete actions such as troop withdrawals, force deployments, or signed documents emerge, the claim remains an unverified announcement with uncertain implications for Gaza’s governance and regional stability.